Fractal models may offer elegant patterns, but true transformation is not replication—it is the ending of the self that seeks to design change. As long as action arises from fragmentation, even values like compassion become structures of thought. Transformation is not scale, but stillness—not coherence, but clarity. It begins not by spreading patterns, but by ending the movement of becoming itself.

An inquiry into the difference between thought and perception, this piece explores how we live in ideas and images about reality rather than in contact with it. It reveals how knowledge, even when well-intentioned, becomes the very barrier to seeing.

This essay explores why even our most advanced frameworks and systems thinking cannot lead to transformation if the self remains the center. True change begins not in design, but in the ending of the observer.

Flowing with Belief and non Belief, with faith and non faith, neither accepting, nor rejecting, seeing, doing it each time still, now who...

By Prof. (Dr.) Naresh Singh ( Originally posted by Jindal India Institute) June 21st, celebrated as the International Day of Yoga ,...

By Divya Bhatnagar When policy is evidence-based it becomes effective and when it is informed by spirituality it gets wiser. The public...

By Devesh Gupta To even begin writing, it is important to understand who the writer is, who the reader is and what the nature of thought...

From Dharamkot, Mcleodganj :)